Case Study · SIERA ESG Platform

Net
Zero
Carbon

Turning one of ESG's most complex data challenges into SIERA's most commercially successful product — 3+ years as UX Lead.

Role
UX Lead & Researcher
Duration
3+ years, ongoing
Platform
B2B / B2C SaaS
Tools
Figma · Axure · Pendo
SIERA ESG Dashboard
18×
Research participant growth in month one
38%
Increase in bespoke feature interaction
24%
Reduction in task completion time
5
New products shipped within NZC since leading
01 — The Problem

Powerful data.
No one could act on it.

The Net Zero Carbon module existed before I joined — but it was overly complex, visually fragmented, and inaccessible to all but the most expert users. Charts had no clear visual grammar, pathways didn't reflect real-world interventions, and there was no hierarchy between fund-level and asset-level data.

Pain Points Identified
😤High user frustration — charts unreadable without domain expertise
🌫️No visual distinction between historical data and future projections
🔍Data quality issues invisible until deep in the workflow
🗺️No clear navigation path from Fund to Asset level
📋Action pathways didn't reflect real-world interventions
Design Opportunities
📐Rebuild IA: Fund view → Asset selection → Pathway drill-down
Colour + shape coded data quality icons for WCAG accessibility
🎯Solid vs dotted lines — instant visual grammar for time
Action-based pathways showing real carbon reduction impact
🏗️Scalable foundations for 5+ future product extensions
02 — Research · Information Architecture

Remapping how users
think about carbon data

Before any wireframe, I ran card sorting exercises to understand how users mentally organise Net Zero concepts. The result was a complete IA rebuild — from a developer-structured hierarchy to one aligned with real user workflows and scientific data requirements.

Net Zero Information Architecture
Full IA map for the Net Zero Carbon module — constructed through card sorting and stakeholder workshops
02 — Research · Process

Research that shaped strategy

I scaled the research programme from 4 participants to 72 within my first month — growing it into a continuous mixed-methods discovery loop that directly shaped the product roadmap, not just validated decisions already made.

01
Stakeholder Workshops & Domain Immersion
I studied environmental science, carbon accounting, and global Net Zero frameworks before touching a wireframe. I ran workshops with sustainability consultants to understand real-life client reporting scenarios — including the offline reports they produce for investors.
Stakeholder WorkshopsDomain ResearchMiro
02
Moderated Sessions & Support Ticket Analysis
Sessions recorded and transcribed. I re-listened to understand the calculations within Net Zero — not just the surface UX pain. Support tickets mined to surface recurring high-frequency issues across the user base.
Moderated TestingThematic AnalysisDovetailSupport Tickets
03
Card Sorting & IA Rebuild
Card sorting revealed how users contextualise NZC attributes. I remapped the entire IA — from a framework built around the engineering data model to one aligned with how users actually think about carbon performance.
Card SortingIA RedesignNavigation Design
04
3-Phase Strategic Roadmap
Working with the Engineering Lead, I built the long-term roadmap. Phase 1: Navigation, accessibility, UX fundamentals. Phase 2: Action plan integration, Energy Efficiency. Phase 3: Importing pathways, Scenario modelling.
RoadmapSprint PlanningKPI Definition
02 — Research · Synthesis

From sticky notes to
actionable design decisions

Dovetail synthesis board
Usability testing synthesis — themes clustered from 3 session types across fund and asset level flows
Annotated usability testing
Annotated sessions with participant competency scores (SIERA vs NZC experience) mapped against key findings
03 — User Needs

Three users.
One product.

A critical early insight: the client who signs the contract is not always the end user. I mapped this distinction explicitly — it changed how we prioritised information hierarchy across the entire module.

👩‍💼
Primary User
Sustainability Consultant
Client reporting & compliance tracking
Core Needs
Rapid access to accurate data for client reports
Instant visibility of data gaps and quality
Exportable outputs without reformatting
Friction
Too many steps to reach actionable insight
No clear fund vs. asset data distinction
📊
Secondary User
Portfolio Manager
Fund performance & NZC commitments
Core Needs
Compare assets against NZC targets visually
Model action plans to evaluate strategies
Understand BAU vs target pathway clearly
Friction
Pathways didn't reflect real interventions
High cognitive load across multiple funds
🏛️
Executive User
ESG Director
Strategic oversight & board reporting
Core Needs
High-level overview without platform expertise
Clear narrative vs science-based targets
Board-ready outputs in one click
Friction
Platform too technical for strategic use
Cannot assess cross-fund performance quickly
04 — Design · NZC 1.0

11 decisions.
All traced to research.

Every feature in Net Zero 1.0 has a direct lineage — a user pain point, a usability session, or a support ticket. The fund-level chart redesign set the foundation everything else was built on.

01
Asset Sidebar
Building photos let users instantly match chart lines to real properties.
02
Solid vs Dotted
One visual convention eliminated the most common chart misreading.
03
Shape + Colour Icons
WCAG-compliant data quality indicators that work for colour-blind users.
04
Fund Data Card
Key ESG metrics at fund level — removed 3 navigation steps.
NZC annotated fund view
NZC 1.0 — annotated fund-level view with numbered design decisions mapped to research findings
04 — Design · Targets & Pathways

Making carbon reduction
tangible and actionable

Through user research I understood how planned interventions directly impact carbon intensity year-on-year. I integrated action-based pathways displaying both the BAU trajectory and the specific steps needed to meet Net Zero goals — so users could see the effect of each sustainable action in real time.

NZC Targets and Pathways
Targets & Pathways — action-based pathway toggle lets users directly compare BAU vs intervention impact on carbon and energy intensity
04 — Design · Asset Level

4-layer drill-down.
Zero lost context.

One of the hardest IA problems was defining how users move from a fund portfolio view down to an individual asset's NZC pathway without losing context. I designed a clear 4-layer flow: Fund → Asset Selection → Asset Pathway → Action Plan.

The asset pop-up card was a key usability finding — users needed carbon intensity, data quality, stranding year, agreed actions, and EPC rating all in one place without leaving the chart.

Asset level NZC view
Asset-level view — pop-up card surfaces all key ESG metrics on click, enabling drill-down without leaving the chart
04 — Design · Fund Pathways

From complexity
to clarity

The fund-level view needed to show five data layers simultaneously — individual asset points, fund carbon intensity, BAU projection, science-based target, and action pathway — without overwhelming the user.

A/B testing validated the chart conventions: circle = complete data, triangle = uplifted/estimated, diamond = fund average. Stranding year callouts surface the most time-critical business risk directly on the chart.

NZC fund level pathways
Fund-level NZC — all pathways visible simultaneously with validated chart conventions and stranding year callout
04 — Design · Client Deliverable

The chart that
reaches boardrooms

Beyond the platform UI, I designed the offline client-facing NZC chart — the artefact consultants export and present directly to fund directors and investors. A different visual language: cleaner, annotation-driven, readable without platform context.

Client-facing NZC chart
Client-facing NZC chart — exported for board presentations, showing fund performance against science-based targets with stranding year and benchmark annotations
05 — Product Analytics

Pendo embedded
before every release

I defined critical user events, set success thresholds, and embedded tracking before each feature shipped — so we could measure whether design decisions actually landed.

Event TrackingFeature Adoption Drop-off AnalysisTime-on-Task
Median Task Completion Time
−24%post redesign
🎯
Bespoke Feature Interaction
+38%vs baseline
👥
Research Participants Scaled
4 → 72month one
🔁
Client Retention Contribution
80%retention rate
How every feature gets made

Research-led.
Every time.

01
Domain Immersion
Science workshops with sustainability experts before any wireframe.
Miro
02
User Research
Moderated sessions, recorded and transcribed. Thematic analysis in Dovetail.
Dovetail
03
Card Sort & IA
Rebuild IA around how users think — not the engineering data model.
Miro
04
Mid-High Prototype
All testing at mid-high fidelity. Low-fi insufficient for complex data UI.
Axure
05
A/B Testing
In-person and remote. 10 participants minimum per cycle. Surveys + interviews.
UserTesting
06
Ship & Measure
Pendo embedded before release. Adoption and drop-offs tracked against KPIs.
Pendo
06 — Business Impact

Design as the
growth engine

NZC became SIERA's most commercially successful product. Every outcome below traces directly to a design decision made through this process.

🏆
Highest-Fee Client Retained
Rapid, high-quality iteration requiring no redesigns built trust in the product direction.
🌎
Major US Client Acquired
Secured a North American infrastructure client, expanding SIERA beyond real estate.
📈
Most Marketable Module
NZC became SIERA's lead product in investor presentations, influencing six-figure deals.
Exec-Driven Accessibility Upgrade
User testing evidence led to an executive decision to replace bubble charts platform-wide.
🧱
Foundation for 5 New Products
The IA and design system built for NZC became the scaffold for every subsequent module.
🔬
Research at Scale
72 participants, recurring discovery cycles — contributes directly to 80% client retention.