Gobinath Aroganam — Senior UX Designer & Researcher CV
Case Study · SIERA ESG Platform · 1+ years

Renewables
Module

Role
Senior Designer + Product Owner
Duration
1+ years (V1 shown)
Platform
B2B / B2C SaaS
Tools
Axure · Figma · Chart.js · Miro
SIERA Renewables Module
New clients
4
New clients engaged in early-stage commitments
Engagement
Increase in client engagement time with renewables features
Asset class
1st
Infrastructure asset type on SIERA — beyond real estate
Localisation
EU+US
Both meter setups delivered in one module
🔒 IP Notice Version 1 shown. V2+ roadmap and data flow diagrams are omitted due to IP protection — these became business-critical reference documents used across the organisation.
01 — The Problem

No brief. No precedent.
No internal stakeholders.

SIERA's entire product history was built around real estate assets — buildings, offices, retail. Two major client discussions, backed by product marketing research, surfaced a clear requirement: SIERA needed to support infrastructure assets. Not just buildings — transportation networks, solar and wind farms, water treatment plants, tunnels. A completely different asset class with different data structures, different regulatory frameworks, and critically, different energy meter setups between EU and US markets.

The Strategic Starting Point
There was no existing brief, no clear direction, and no internal stakeholders with the domain knowledge needed. I had to build the solution framework from scratch — researching sustainable metrics around solar energy consumption, generation and export, reaching out to internal EU and US teams independently to understand delivery requirements for both markets simultaneously.
Challenges inherited
🏗️Ambiguous scope — no brief, no precedent, no existing design patterns for infrastructure
📋No brief, no defined direction, no domain stakeholders available
🌍EU and US energy meters work fundamentally differently
📊Standard bar charts misrepresent US bi-directional meter data
⏱️Fast-paced delivery — client acquisition and renewals running simultaneously
What I took ownership of
🔬Built the entire solution framework independently
🌐Reached out to EU and US internal teams to map delivery differences
📐Redesigned IA for a new asset type from zero
📈Introduced waterfall charts for accurate US localisation
👥Led dev team and trained a Junior Product Owner
02 — Methodology

Double Diamond.
Agile delivery.

I adopted the Double Diamond methodology to enable an agile delivery approach — combining primary and secondary research with continuous design iteration. The Discover and Define phases built the knowledge base. The Develop and Deliver phases translated it into a shipped MVP.

Double Diamond methodology diagram — Discover, Define, Develop, Deliver
Double Diamond — adapted for rapid delivery, with research and iteration running in parallel
02 — Research & Discovery

Building knowledge
where none existed

With no internal stakeholders and no existing design patterns for infrastructure assets, I had to become the domain expert. This meant researching solar energy fundamentals, understanding regulatory differences between markets, and devising a new research strategy suited to the fast-paced delivery requirements.

01
Domain immersion — solar energy fundamentals
Researched the core metrics of solar energy: On-site generation, Off-site generation, Export to grid, Consumption, and how each is measured, calculated, and reported. This informed every subsequent design decision.
Domain ResearchEnergy MetricsRegulatory Frameworks
02
EU vs US meter setup — the critical discovery
EU meters are uni-directional and provide three discrete readings: generation, consumption, and export. US meters are bi-directional, recording only net consumption. This means the data cannot be represented the same way in both markets — a discovery that drove the most significant design decision in the project.
Localisation ResearchTechnical DiscoveryEU/US Markets
03
Internal stakeholder outreach — EU & US teams
With no dedicated stakeholders available, I reached out independently to internal teams across both markets. This ensured the module would serve existing EU clients and the new US infrastructure client simultaneously — making sure resources spent had maximum impact across both.
Stakeholder ManagementCross-Market ResearchRequirements Gathering
04
Data flow mapping — from meter to interface
I developed a comprehensive data flow that showed how each renewable energy metric contributes to every UI touchpoint. This became a business-critical reference document used across the organisation, including by sustainability consultants — too sensitive to share publicly due to IP protection.
Data Flow DesignSystems ThinkingCross-team Documentation
05
Rapid UX feedback sessions — adapted research strategy
The fast-paced turnaround required a research strategy different from NZC. I implemented rapid feedback cycles with internal consultants, creating thematic clusters from each session to drive iterative design improvements. Design iterations were developed quickly and continuously stress-tested.
Rapid UX FeedbackThematic AnalysisAgile Research
02 — Research · Information Architecture

Mapping every metric
to every touchpoint

After the expert sessions, I built a full IA linking the Renewables module to all relevant SIERA modules — Performance view, Fund Dashboard, Actions, Documents, NZC, and Waste. This ensured all accountable teams had visibility of the vision and that the module was designed to integrate with the platform's existing architecture, not sit alongside it.

Renewables information architecture map showing all linked modules and data relationships
Full IA map — Renewables linked to Performance, Dashboard, Actions, Documents, NZC and Waste modules. Became the shared reference for all teams.
02 — Research · Energy Data Flow

From meter to
dashboard

The data flow I built mapped every renewable energy metric from its physical source — the energy meter — through the calculation layer, to every UI touchpoint in the module. This became a business-critical reference document used across the organisation, including by sustainability consultants. The original Miro file cannot be shared due to IP protection — this is a reconstructed version for portfolio purposes using the actual colour system.

Forest green — on-site generated Light green — off-site / supplier Amber — exported to grid Orange — non-renewable
Renewable energy data flow — from meter to dashboard card Data flow diagram showing how EU and US energy meters feed through calculation layers to produce the metrics shown on the Fund Dashboard Renewables card PHYSICAL LAYER — ENERGY METERS EU energy meter Uni-directional · 3 discrete readings Generated Consumed Exported US energy meter Bi-directional · net consumption only Net consumption +/− KEY DESIGN CHOICE CALCULATION LAYER Stacked bar calculation Generated − Consumed = Exported All values positive · segments independent Waterfall chart calculation Net value crosses zero axis Stacked bar would misrepresent data DERIVED METRICS Self consumption Generated ÷ Consumed % & kWh Exported to grid Generated − Consumed % & kWh Off-site purchased Supplier meter reading % & kWh Non-renewable Total − All renewables % & kWh UI TOUCHPOINTS Fund Dashboard — Renewables card Generation doughnut (self + exported) Consumption doughnut — 3-way source split Headline kWh + % of GIA + assets covered Inline tooltips — definition + calculation → The card that secured the client Asset Dashboard Renewables column per-asset hover popup On-site Renewable badge Performance View EU stacked bar chart US waterfall chart Chart view toggles Asset-level drill-down Colour system consistent across all touchpoints — forest, light green, amber, brown Tooltip pattern throughout — definition + calculation surfaced on demand Reconstructed for portfolio · Original Miro data flow omitted due to IP protection Colour system and metric relationships are accurate
Energy data flow — from physical meter to UI touchpoint. The original document became a cross-org reference used by sustainability consultants across the business.
03 — Chart Research

Choosing the right
visual language

Before committing to any chart type, I conducted secondary research to understand how renewable energy data is typically visualised — studying waterfall charts, horizontal bar charts, Sankey diagrams, clustered bars, and doughnut charts. I also worked with technical developers to validate which chart types were feasible within the React and Chart.js integration.

Chart research study — waterfall, horizontal bar, Sankey, clustered bar and doughnut chart options evaluated
Chart research study — five chart types evaluated for ergonomics, accuracy, and technical feasibility with React and Chart.js
03 — Stakeholder Journey

From reporting pain
to design response

User research on this project was genuinely tough: few internal stakeholders knew exactly what client delivery required, and even expert interviews didn’t surface the answers I needed. I went out of my way — extensive independent research, finding the right personnel across both markets, and calculating what we could realistically deliver. The journey below is what that effort produced: the quarterly reporting cycle emerged as the moment where renewable data caused the most friction, and every design response in the module traces back to a stakeholder pain found there.

Stakeholder journey map — quarterly ESG reporting with renewable data Journey map synthesised from rapid feedback sessions: stages, user goals, confidence curve, pain points and the shipped design responses REPORTING TRIGGER LOCATE DATA INTERPRET COMPARE ASSETS REPORT OUT USER GOAL CONFIDENCE PAIN POINTS DESIGN RESPONSE Evidence renewable performance for the quarterly ESG cycle See renewables at fund level, in one place Understand what each metric actually means Spot under- and over-performing assets Report defensible numbers to investors and regulators Data scattered across suppliers, meters and spreadsheets EU and US assets report differently — no single source of truth Jargon-heavy metrics — novices and experts share one screen EU stacked vs US net data can’t be compared like-for-like Figures hard to trust without seeing how they’re calculated Renewables surfaced on the Fund Dashboard — no hunting One card aggregates every asset across EU and US Inline tooltips — definition + calculation on demand Asset drill-down + EU/US-correct charts (stacked / waterfall) Consistent colour system + transparent calculations Voices behind the map — infrastructure consultants, ESG directors and client-side fund teams across EU & US Synthesised for portfolio — journey map created retrospectively from the rapid UX feedback sessions Pain points reflect session themes · every design response shipped in the module
Stakeholder journey — quarterly ESG reporting cycle. Pain points clustered from feedback sessions; each design response maps to a shipped feature.
A Framework Beyond One Module
This research did more than shape a single module — working alone, I showed the organisation how it could deliver renewables going forward, and put a framework in place for future delivery across the portfolio. The framework itself can’t be shown due to IP protection, but the journey above and the energy data flow are reconstructions of its core thinking.
03 — Key Strategic Decision

When a bar chart
lies to your users

This was the most technically significant design decision in the project. EU energy meters are uni-directional — they record generation, consumption, and export as three separate values. A standard stacked bar chart represents this accurately. US meters are bi-directional — they record net consumption only. The value can be positive or negative depending on whether more energy was generated or consumed in a given period.

EU — Uni-directional meters

Three discrete meter readings: On-site generated, Consumed, Exported. Each value is always positive. A stacked bar chart accurately represents the relationship between all three.

EU stacked bar chart — solar performance
EU asset — stacked bar accurately shows consumed vs generated vs exported
US — Bi-directional meters

One net consumption reading that can be positive or negative. A standard bar chart cannot show values crossing zero — it misrepresents the data. A waterfall chart was the correct solution: it handles positive and negative values, shows the net flow clearly, and gives users accurate solar usage representation.

US waterfall chart — net consumption
US fund — waterfall chart correctly represents bi-directional net consumption
Why This Mattered Commercially
Showing US clients an inaccurate representation of their solar data — even one that looked clean — would have undermined trust in the platform immediately. The waterfall chart was not a stylistic choice. It was a technically defensible decision based on how energy meters are physically wired in the US market, validated through research and stakeholder review.
03 — Meter Scenarios · EU vs US

Three scenarios.
Two markets.

To validate the chart decision, I mapped every combination of generation and tariff to its correct meter setup and visual representation — solar with a renewable tariff, solar with a non-renewable tariff, and no solar on a mixed tariff. These scenario boards became the reference for how each combination renders in both markets, and why the waterfall only ever appears on US assets with on-site solar.

Scenario 1 — Solar + Renewable Tariff
Scenario 1 — solar farm and building with solar on a renewable tariff, EU stacked bar vs US waterfall
1
Light green — supplier renewable
Consumption from the supplier under a renewable (green) tariff — otherwise known as “Green energy” in industry.
2
Forest green — on-site generated
Consumption generated from the asset’s own renewable source on site.
3
Yellow — exported to grid
Energy exported back to the grid.
4
Three separate EU meters
Consumption, generation and export are each metered separately in the EU. Export works against consumption, so it is displayed as negative for ergonomics and cognition — validated during testing.
5
Forest green — net consumed
A single net-consumption reading drives the waterfall: positive = net consumed.
6
Light green — net exported
Negative net consumption = exported back to the grid. Because the asset is on a green tariff, it visually shows that energy going back still comes from a renewable source.
7
One bi-directional meter
In US setups, consumption and export sit in one bi-directional meter. Consumption from the tariff and from the on-site renewable source cannot be accurately distinguished due to the meter setup.
Scenario 1 — on-site solar with a 100% renewable supply tariff, rendered for EU and US meter setups · hover or tap the numbered markers
1
Light green — supplier renewable
Consumption from the supplier under a renewable (green) tariff — otherwise known as “Green energy” in industry.
2
Forest green — on-site generated
Consumption generated from the asset’s own renewable source on site.
3
Yellow — exported to grid
Energy exported back to the grid.
4
Three separate EU meters
Consumption, generation and export are each metered separately in the EU. Export works against consumption, so it is displayed as negative for ergonomics and cognition — validated during testing.
5
Forest green — net consumed
A single net-consumption reading drives the waterfall: positive = net consumed.
6
Light green — net exported
Negative net consumption = exported back to the grid. Because the asset is on a green tariff, it visually shows that energy going back still comes from a renewable source.
7
One bi-directional meter
In US setups, consumption and export sit in one bi-directional meter. Consumption from the tariff and from the on-site renewable source cannot be accurately distinguished due to the meter setup.
Every reading is positive at the meter — it is the chart, not the meter, that expresses export as a negative value. Even with bi-directional meters, export works against consumption, so it is displayed as negative for ergonomics and cognition — validated during testing.
Scenario 2 — Solar + Non-Renewable Tariff
Scenario 2 — solar farm and building with solar on a non-renewable tariff, EU stacked bar vs US waterfall
1
Light brown — supplier non-renewable
Consumption from the supplier on a non-renewable tariff (fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil) — otherwise known as “Brown energy” in industry.
2
Forest green — on-site generated
Consumption generated from the asset’s own renewable source on site.
3
Yellow — exported to grid
Energy exported back to the grid from the solar panels on the roof.
4
Three separate EU meters
Consumption, generation and export are each metered separately in the EU. The brown consumption segment now shows the supplier is a non-renewable source.
5
Forest green — net consumed
A single net-consumption reading drives the waterfall: positive = net consumed.
6
Light brown — net exported
Negative net consumption = exported back to the grid. Because the asset is on a brown-energy tariff, it visually shows that energy going back comes from a non-renewable supply context.
Scenario 2 — same on-site solar, but supplier electricity includes fossil fuels (coal, gas, oil) · hover or tap the numbered markers
1
Light brown — supplier non-renewable
Consumption from the supplier on a non-renewable tariff (fossil fuels such as coal, gas and oil) — otherwise known as “Brown energy” in industry.
2
Forest green — on-site generated
Consumption generated from the asset’s own renewable source on site.
3
Yellow — exported to grid
Energy exported back to the grid from the solar panels on the roof.
4
Three separate EU meters
Consumption, generation and export are each metered separately in the EU. The brown consumption segment now shows the supplier is a non-renewable source.
5
Forest green — net consumed
A single net-consumption reading drives the waterfall: positive = net consumed.
6
Light brown — net exported
Negative net consumption = exported back to the grid. Because the asset is on a brown-energy tariff, it visually shows that energy going back comes from a non-renewable supply context.
Only the supplier segments change between scenarios. Forest green on-site consumption and yellow export are untouched — the colour system does the storytelling between scenarios.
Scenario 3 — No Solar + Mixed Tariff
Scenario 3 — building without solar on a mixed renewable and non-renewable tariff, identical EU and US bars
1
2
3
4
Scenario 3 — no on-site generation; both markets converge on the same stacked consumption bar
1
No solar — no export, no bi-directional meter
With no on-site generation the asset draws all of its electricity from supply, on a tariff that mixes renewable and non-renewable sources. There is nothing to export, so no value can ever cross zero.
2
One stacked consumption bar
Light green for the renewable portion, orange/brown for the fossil-fuel portion — the supplier fuel-mix split applied to a single consumption stack.
3
Two gauges, one bar
The renewable and non-renewable portions are tracked separately but always presented as one consumption stack — keeping the visual grammar consistent with the solar scenarios.
4
The control case — EU and US are identical
Without on-site generation there is no net export, so the EU/US localisation difference disappears entirely. This is the proof that the waterfall is only ever needed on US assets with solar and a bi-directional meter.
03 — Design · Colour & Data Encoding

Colour as a
semantic system

Every colour in the Renewables module encodes a specific energy type. This system was designed to be immediately readable by both expert users who understand energy metrics and novice users learning the platform — consistent across every chart, card, and tooltip throughout the module.

Forest Green On-site renewable generated
Light Green Off-site / supplier renewable
Amber / Yellow Exported back to grid
Orange / Brown Non-renewable (brown) energy
Fund level EU renewables performance view
Fund Level EU — colour-coded stacked bar showing on-site vs off-site generation with tooltip hover
04 — Prototype Walkthrough

Hear the decisions
behind the design

A walkthrough of the Renewables module prototype — covering the problem, the EU/US research, the key design decisions, and what shipped. EU and US asset views are both demonstrated.

04 — Design

Complexity made
navigable

The core design challenge was making complex renewable energy data readable for both expert users — who need precise metrics and technical accuracy — and novice users who are learning what the data means. Consistent tooltips, redesigned toolbars, and a scalable IA bridged both needs without overwhelming either group.

Asset Dashboard — Renewables column

The Assets list was redesigned to include a dedicated Renewables column, surfacing key solar metrics at a glance. Hover states reveal the breakdown — On-site generated, Off-site generated, Exported, and Consumed — using the colour system consistently across the entire list.

The "On site Renewable" badge allows instant filtering of assets with renewable coverage, reducing time to insight for consultants managing large portfolios.

Asset dashboard with renewables column hover popup
Asset list with Renewables column — hover reveals full breakdown per asset
04 — Design · The Pitch That Started It

One card.
One conversation.

In the initial client meeting, I pitched the Renewables card as a proof of concept — demonstrating exactly how we could surface solar performance data within SIERA's existing dashboard framework. That single card secured the engagement. Everything that followed — the IA redesign, the EU/US localisation, the waterfall chart, the junior PO I trained — was built on the foundation of that pitch.

End-to-End Ownership
I identified who to speak to, reached out independently across the US and EU — without being asked, without a brief, without assigned stakeholders. I ran expert sessions with ESG Directors, Senior Consultants, and Sales teams. I built the IA. I defined the metrics. I designed the card. I trained the Junior PO. I led the dev team. Not out of ambition — because there was no one else, and the work needed to be done properly.
Fund Dashboard Renewables card — the proof of concept that secured the client
1
2
3
4
5
1
Headline metrics — immediate fund-level read
On-site generation (3,514 kWh), percentage of GIA covered (86%), and number of assets with renewables (44/46) are surfaced above the charts. An ESG Director can assess portfolio-level renewable performance in under five seconds without drilling down.
2
Generation doughnut — self consumption vs exported
The first doughnut shows how on-site generated solar energy was used — 12% consumed on-site (forest green), 88% exported back to the grid (amber/yellow). The colour system makes the split immediately legible without reading the legend.
3
The directional insight that mattered to the client
70% contribution to electricity consumption — shown with the kWh value alongside. This single metric answered the client's core question: "How much of our electricity need is being met by renewables?" It was the insight that made the pitch land.
4
Consumption doughnut — three-way energy source split
The second doughnut shows where electricity consumption came from: on-site generated (forest green), off-site purchased renewable (light green), and non-renewables (grey/white). This gives fund managers a clear picture of their renewable dependency and reduction opportunity.
5
Breakdown labels — precise values alongside percentages
Every percentage is paired with an absolute kWh value. Expert users — consultants producing client reports — need exact figures. Non-expert users get the percentage for context. Both needs served from a single, compact card layout.
US Market Variant — Bi-directional meter

Same card.
Different data reality.

The US version of the fund card uses the same design language but adapts to what a bi-directional meter can actually provide. With only one net reading available, the top section leads with a signed net consumption figure rather than a split doughnut — simpler, but no less precise. The coverage doughnut at the bottom uses teal to represent renewable coverage in aggregate — on-site generated or off-site green tariff — because the bi-directional meter cannot split the two, and fabricating that split would be dishonest data design.

US fund dashboard renewables card — net consumption +56 MWh with consumed and exported breakdown and coverage doughnut
1
2
3
4
5
1
Net consumption — signed headline
+56 MWh means the fund was a net consumer this period. If the fund exported more than it consumed across all assets, this figure would show as negative — making the directional story instant at a glance.
2
Forest green — net consumed
156 MWh total consumed across all assets (61% of gross activity). The positive reading from the bi-directional meter — what the assets drew from the grid after solar offset.
3
Yellow — net exported, colour system carries meaning
100 MWh exported back to the grid (39% of gross activity). Yellow carries the same export meaning as the EU stacked bar — the colour system does the storytelling across both market variants without explanation.
4
Teal coverage — renewable in aggregate, not split
The coverage doughnut shows renewable data coverage across on-site generated and off-site green tariff combined. Teal represents the aggregate renewable signal — the bi-directional meter cannot split the two, so the design does not claim to.
5
Coverage doughnut — identical logic to EU
Renewable energy data coverage by area and assets with on-site generation come from asset configuration data, not meter readings. Same metric, same visual position across both markets.
04 — Design

Complexity made
navigable

The core design challenge was making complex renewable energy data readable for both expert users — who need precise metrics and technical accuracy — and novice users who are learning what the data means. Consistent tooltips, redesigned toolbars, and a scalable IA bridged both needs without overwhelming either group.

Asset Level — chart views

At asset level, users can toggle between multiple chart views to analyse different aspects of solar performance. Each view uses consistent colour encoding and tooltip patterns so users can switch contexts without relearning the interface.

1 of 4 — Consumed vs Generated (with tooltip)
04 — Design · Inclusivity

Expert precision.
Novice clarity.

A fundamental design principle throughout the module: technical users need precise, accurate data visuals. Non-expert users need to understand what the data means. Rather than designing for one or the other, I designed for both — through consistent tooltip patterns, redesigned toolbars, and deliberate cognitive ergonomics.

Tooltip system

Every metric in the Renewables module includes an inline tooltip that shows the definition and calculation behind the data. This surfaces the "why" for novice users without cluttering the interface for experts. The pattern was consistent across all chart types, toolbars, and data cards.

Toolbar redesign

Toolbars were redesigned to improve cognitive ergonomics — reducing visual overload while ensuring end users could access the full complexity of the data when needed. The design is scalable: as new renewable energy sources are added in future versions, the toolbar structure accommodates them without requiring a redesign.

Dashboard doughnut — directional clarity

The dashboard doughnut chart shows net consumption in one direction only — illustrating how much of the generated solar energy was consumed on-site versus exported. This was a deliberate simplification: the full breakdown lives at asset level. The dashboard gives the director-level view; the drill-down gives the consultant-level detail.

Asset renewables — chart view variants
Multiple chart views accessible via dropdown — same colour system, different analytical lens
05 — Business Impact

A new market.
From one module.

The Renewables module was not just a feature addition. It represented SIERA's ability to serve an entirely new client type — infrastructure — for the first time. The commercial implications extended beyond the immediate client.

🏗️
First Infrastructure Client
Secured SIERA's first infrastructure asset client — a solar farm operator. Demonstrated the platform could go beyond real estate into any asset type with renewable generation.
🌎
New Customer Category
Infrastructure became a viable and scalable new customer type at SIERA. Transportation networks, solar & wind farms, water treatment plants, tunnels. The foundations laid here opened a pathway to airports and beyond.
📈
2× Client Engagement
Client engagement time doubled when using renewable energy generation features — demonstrating the module delivered immediate, measurable user value from day one.
🤝
4 New Client Commitments
Four new clients entered early-stage commitments off the back of the Renewables module — directly attributable to the infrastructure expansion capability it demonstrated.
🔄
Renewals Protected
MVP was delivered in time to serve existing contract renewals alongside the new client acquisition — ensuring maximum commercial impact from a single development cycle.
🌍
EU & US in One Module
Both market localisations — EU stacked bar and US waterfall — delivered simultaneously, ensuring existing clients were not disadvantaged while onboarding the new infrastructure client.
👥
Team Leadership
Led a development team and trained a Junior Product Owner — taking accountability beyond the original UX brief and embracing the Senior Designer + Product Owner responsibility.
📋
Cross-org Reference Document
The data flow diagram I created became a reference document used across the business — including by sustainability consultants — the first time a UX artefact became operational infrastructure at SIERA.
The Shipped Product — V1

What users see today

Three views from the live Renewables module — V1 only shown due to IP protection. V2+ extends the module to additional renewable sources and airport infrastructure.

1 of 3 — Fund Level EU performance
What I'd Do Differently
I'd push for dedicated domain stakeholders earlier in the process rather than self-sourcing research. The data flow document I created proved critical — having a formal knowledge-transfer process from the start would have accelerated delivery and reduced risk. I'd also instrument analytics from day one to measure how users navigate between EU and US chart types. And I'd have named the module Infrastructure & Renewables from the start — solar was the entry point, but the module was always designed to scale to wind, hydro, geothermal and beyond.
Delivery Process

Built from
first principles

01
Domain Research
Solar energy metrics, regulatory frameworks, EU vs US meter differences.
Self-directed
02
Data Flow Mapping
Every metric mapped from source to UI touchpoint. Became org-wide reference.
Miro
03
IA & Chart Design
Waterfall for US, stacked bar for EU. Colour system defined.
Axure · Figma
04
Rapid Feedback
Internal consultant sessions. Thematic clusters → iterative improvements.
UX Sessions
05
Ship & Scale
V1 delivered. V2+ roadmap mapped for wind, hydro, geothermal and airport infrastructure.
Chart.js

Explore more work

Return to the homepage to view other case studies

← Back to Home Get in touch